Return to programme
  • 2018-11-02T15:00:00 2018-11-02T18:30:00 Europe/Paris INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS Centro de Congressos D. Maria UIA
    Add To calendar

INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS

  • 02/11/2018 - 14:00 - 17:30
  • Centro de Congressos D. Maria

Presentation

Is it Wise, and is it still Properly Defensible to Continue to Exclude this Vienna Convention Blindly, Merely Because we are More Comfortable Using our National Law?                                       

In our practice as specialists in international sales under the Vienna Convention, my colleagues and I have observed with dismay that many of our colleagues rule out the use of one of the most harmonised instruments at present, for the sole reason, in reality, that they are not proficient in its application and/or that they feel considerably more comfortable using their national law. This is despite the fact that the main advantage of the CISG is to provide common, balanced language for international sales, through which each stakeholder, regardless of his/her country, can understand and ascertain the legal and economic position of his/her partner. This overly/excessively frequent exclusion of the CISG is moreover not without risks: some courts are now prepared to penalise lawyers who may have advised their clients to exclude the CISG, on the grounds that, in light of the circumstances, this was a breach of their duty to advise.

Documents

  • Report
    English

    Consequences of the exclusion of the CISG (Part II)

    Mariaelena GIORCELLI

    Consequences of the exclusion of the CISG (Part II)

    Constraints and problems for commercial actors located in countries with a common set of rules – the example of the Rome I Regulation in the European Union

  • Report
    English

    Reasons to exclude the GISG

    Gisella LEVI CAROTI

    Reasons to exclude the GISG

    The aim of this report is to explain why we always exclude the application of the Convention on the International Sales of Goods (“CISG”, “Convention”) from the commercial agreements we draft on behalf of our clients.

    To this end, in Part I of this report, we will analyze the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) applied in most of the states of the United States, with a focus on the Parol Evidence Rule (§ 2-202 Uniform Commercial Code). We will then review the articles of the Convention we disagree with and explain the reasons of our disagreement. In Part II, we will review cases of the Federal Courts of the United States where the Courts have applied the Convention over the Uniform Commercial Code. Among such cases, one decision will be analyzed in more detail, the “D’Agostino case”, in which one of our clients (Ceramica D’Agostino) was involved. The last part of this work, focuses on the cases where the U.S Courts have applied Articles12 and 96 of the Convention.

See more See less